Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservation Analysis
Assessment of the Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations Regional Vendor Pilot program, including considerations of operations, food quality, and stakeholder satisfaction.

At MSG, research and evaluation services empower public and nonprofit agencies to make evidence-informed decisions that drive lasting impact. We design and implement rigorous evaluations—quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods—across education, workforce development, health, and human services. Our approach goes beyond traditional evaluation by integrating technical assistance, IT solutions, strategic communications, and training to ensure findings are actionable and sustainable.
MSG is uniquely positioned to support clients from data collection to dissemination. We help build capacity through tailored technical assistance and enhance data quality and accessibility with user-centered digital tools. We ensure insights are translated into practice through compelling communications and practical learning experiences. Our team of methodologists, subject matter experts, and change agents brings a collaborative lens to every project.
With a strong federal track record and a commitment to universal, participatory methods, MSG stands out as a trusted partner for advancing outcomes, building knowledge, and fostering continuous improvement.
Contact

MSG’s research and evaluation services combine methodological rigor with subject matter expertise in education, workforce development, health and human services, housing, and transportation. We translate evidence into action, build client capacity, and deliver user-centered insights that drive data-informed decision-making across sectors. Our collaborative, end-to-end approach sets us apart as a results-driven, innovation-focused partner.

Assessment of the Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations Regional Vendor Pilot program, including considerations of operations, food quality, and stakeholder satisfaction.
MSG supported the DOL Chief Evaluation Office (CEO) in advancing multiple agencies' research agendas through the Evaluation, Technical Support, and Logistics project. We engaged 45+ subject matter experts to participate in research roundtables, organized 4 national competitions, including the CEO Summer Fellowship, and planned and facilitated 20+ webinars to engage experts and disseminate CEO's work. Our work supported collaborations between CEO and multiple DOL agencies on topics ranging from substance use disorder to veteran employment and disability.
MSG conducted a research project on behalf of USDA to identify components that explain the State variations in SNAP administrative expenses, including the impact of geographic pay differences; state and caseload characteristics; and variations in eligibility systems and certification options. The evaluation also determined the relationship between payment accuracy, timeliness in application processing, and program access on State administrative expenses.
MSG developed a valid and reliable method to assess an error in the multimillion-dollar Child and Adult Food Care Program (CACFP), a program that provides nutritious food to ensure wellness, healthy growth, and the development of young children.
Provide support on strategies to improve customer satisfaction with the effectiveness of the offshore inspection program for oil and gas facilities in the Gulf of Mexico.
Support the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation to develop a calculator web app and replication to-go kit to help families and caseworkers navigate marginal tax rates, also know as benefits cliff, and plot a path towards self-sufficiency.
MSG collected data and performed site visits across New York-based 21st CCLC programs and evaluated program participants’ academic and behavioral outcomes. Using best practices in program evaluation, MSG assessed the effectiveness of the regional Resource Centers in supporting the 21st CCLC program implementation. Following the evaluation procedures, MSG produced reports summarizing their findings and generated a Professional Development protocol based on the evaluation results.